<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Essay on Pavan Yara</title><link>https://pavanyara.com/tags/essay/</link><description>Recent content in Essay on Pavan Yara</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-US</language><managingEditor>pavan.yara@gmail.com (Pavan Yara)</managingEditor><webMaster>pavan.yara@gmail.com (Pavan Yara)</webMaster><copyright>Pavan Yara</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pavanyara.com/tags/essay/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Goal of An Essay</title><link>https://pavanyara.com/blog/goal-of-an-essay/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:24:00 +0530</pubDate><author>pavan.yara@gmail.com (Pavan Yara)</author><guid>https://pavanyara.com/blog/goal-of-an-essay/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I think the goal of an essay should be to discover surprising things. That&amp;rsquo;s my goal, at least. And most surprising means most different from what people currently believe. So writing to persuade and writing to discover are diametrically opposed. The more your conclusions disagree with readers&amp;rsquo; present beliefs, the more effort you&amp;rsquo;ll have to expend on selling your ideas rather than having them. As you accelerate, this drag increases, till eventually you reach a point where 100% of your energy is devoted to overcoming it and you can&amp;rsquo;t go any faster. It&amp;rsquo;s hard enough to overcome one&amp;rsquo;s own misconceptions without having to think about how to get the resulting ideas past other people&amp;rsquo;s. I worry that if I wrote to persuade, I&amp;rsquo;d start to shy away unconsciously from ideas I knew would be hard to sell. When I notice something surprising, it&amp;rsquo;s usually very faint at first. There&amp;rsquo;s nothing more than a slight stirring of discomfort. I don&amp;rsquo;t want anything to get in the way of noticing it consciously.&amp;rdquo; ~Paul Graham&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;I think the goal of an essay should be to discover surprising things. That&rsquo;s my goal, at least. And most surprising means most different from what people currently believe. So writing to persuade and writing to discover are diametrically opposed. The more your conclusions disagree with readers&rsquo; present beliefs, the more effort you&rsquo;ll have to expend on selling your ideas rather than having them. As you accelerate, this drag increases, till eventually you reach a point where 100% of your energy is devoted to overcoming it and you can&rsquo;t go any faster. It&rsquo;s hard enough to overcome one&rsquo;s own misconceptions without having to think about how to get the resulting ideas past other people&rsquo;s. I worry that if I wrote to persuade, I&rsquo;d start to shy away unconsciously from ideas I knew would be hard to sell. When I notice something surprising, it&rsquo;s usually very faint at first. There&rsquo;s nothing more than a slight stirring of discomfort. I don&rsquo;t want anything to get in the way of noticing it consciously.&rdquo; ~Paul Graham&gt; &gt; &gt;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>